|

|

|

|
|

|
Receive
a Cervino
Capital
Management
Performance
Report by
Email:
|

|
|

|

|

|
PLEASE NOTE: ALTAVRA
does NOT charge a load,
upfront or initial fee
on any account.
|
Program Description:
Overview of
Advisor's Methodology
|
Cervino Capital
Management
currently offers three
separate investment
programs: Diversified
Options Strategy 1X,
Diversified Options
Strategy 2X, and a
Commodity Options
Program. Each investment
strategy involves
trading in derivatives
and is intended
primarily for
sophisticated investors.
The overarching goal of
the Cervino Capital
Management's money management
services is the capital
appreciation of its clients’
investments through speculation
mainly in exchange traded
derivative contracts such
as futures
and options on futures.
No assurance can be
given that this
objective will be met,
and any investments in
an account to be traded
by Cervino Capital
Management should only
be considered by
investors that can
assume the significant
risk of trading futures
and options on futures,
including losses in
excess of their initial
investments.
Cervino Capital
Management will attempt
to meet the objective of
capital appreciation for
this investment program
by making trading decisions
based upon proprietary trading
methodologies.
Cervino Capital
Management
generally relies
on fundamental, technical
or quantitative analysis,
or a combination of each,
in making trading decisions
and attempting to anticipate
price movements.
Fundamental analysis looks
at the factors that affect
the supply and demand of
a particular commodity or
financial asset in order
to predict the expected
market price for that asset.
Such factors include, but
are not limited to, government
actions (e.g., Federal Reserve
discount rate, imposition
of embargoes, price controls,
etc.), the release of information
concerning weather conditions
(e.g., reports of frost
in certain growing areas),
or the release of economic
statistics (e.g., Consumer
Price Index, Housing Starts,
Unemployment Rate, etc.)
resulting in actual or probable
significant price movements.
Technical analysis is not
based on the anticipated
supply and demand of the
cash (actual) commodity
or financial asset; instead,
it is based on the theory
that a study of the movement
of markets themselves will
provide a means of anticipating
future prices. Technical
analysis often includes
the study of intra-day,
daily, weekly, and monthly
prices, volume and open
interest data, and utilizes
charts and/or computers
for analysis of these items.
Another type of technical
analysis is market sentiment
which is based on the theory
of contrary opinion and
assumes that when investors
swing to emotional extremes
they are likely to be overreacting.
Sentiment indicators such
as short sales or put and
call activity is used to
highlight junctures of bullish
excess (overbought) and
bearish excess (oversold),
which are useful leading
indicators of trend exhaustion.
In addition to fundamental
and technical analysis,
trading decisions may be
based on quantitative analysis,
a technique that seeks to
understand price behavior
by using complex mathematical
and statistical modeling,
measurement and research.
For example, since an option’s
price is a function of its
strike price, time to expiration,
underlying asset’s price
and volatility, and short-term
interest rates, it is logical
that a formula can calculate
option prices from these
variables. Therefore,
utilizing statistical analysis,
a model of price variation
on a particular futures
contract
may be used to theoretically
determine the fair value
of an option on such futures
contract.
In developing its market
opinion and evaluating
potential trades,
Cervino Capital
Management generally
uses a blended combination
of mechanical signals and
subjective interpretation
of fundamental studies,
technical and sentiment
indicators, as well as statistical
probability analysis. This
research includes, but is
not limited to, continuous
analysis of short- and long-term
price series, the impact
of seasonal and cyclical
price movements upon the
underlying price trend,
fundamental factors affecting
supply and demand influences,
and application of statistical
models in order to consider
risk factors associated
with various trading opportunities.
The intent is to identify
and arbitrage price discrepancies
that reflect under- and
over-valuations as well
as directional trend bias
or trend-reversal/mean reversion
opportunities, and to produce
a replicable trade execution
process consisting of positions
with statistically high
probabilities of positive
outcomes. To accomplish
this goal, the Advisor utilizes
options to structure complex
positions that within one
or across several underlying
asset exposures can tactically
reflect one or more trading
perspectives, such as hedged
relative value, fundamentally-based,
or volatility/opportunistic
investment strategies.
Risk control is achieved
through a variety of means
which should in most, but
not necessarily all, market
conditions help minimize
the impact of drawdowns.
The first is portfolio
constructions and
diversification such as
the use of hedged
positions across several
underlying assets;
second is controlling
leverage through
position sizing adjusted
according to account
size, market volatility
and risk-reward
analysis; and third is
stops based on money
management rules. Risk
management is deemed to
be an ongoing process
and therefore the
Advisor continually
monitors all positions.
Occasionally Cervino
Capital Management may adjust positions
either by entering into
new positions which hedge
existing market exposure,
or by liquidating and/or
covering existing positions
in order to reduce market
exposure or reset a position
at different strike price(s)
and/or contract expiration(s).
Prospective investors
should be aware that
Cervino Capital
Management's trading
programs may be more
aggressive than most
other trading programs.
This is due to the fact
that the Advisor's
trading strategy
primarily utilizes
options on futures, and
the Advisor will
typically adjust its
positions on a regular
basis. As a result, it
is anticipated that the
velocity, or turnover
rate, may be
substantially higher
than the turnover in
other money management
programs. Accordingly,
Cervino Capital
Management's
trading strategy can result
in substantially greater
commission charges that
may rapidly deplete the
equity in a client's account
in the event the Advisor's
strategies are not successful.
The trading methods employed
by the Advisor may be profitable
overall, however, there
may be periods in which
such trading methods may
result in substantial trading
losses.
|
Diversified
Options Strategy
1X and 2X Programs
|
Cervino Capital
Management’s Diversified
Options Strategy 1X and
2X involve trading in a
diversified portfolio of
option on futures contracts
including options on equity
index futures. Diversified
Options Strategy 1X is a
baseline program and the
past performance of this
program is set forth in
Section 7 Performance. Diversified
Options Strategy 2X is leverage
at two times the Diversified
Options Strategy 1X program;
in other words, the 2X program
will trade twice as many
contracts as the 1X program
for the same nominal account
size. Accordingly, the additional
leverage of the 2X program
is expected to result in
increased account volatility,
and therefore an increased
potential for higher returns
as well as an increased
potential for larger drawdowns.
These programs are designed
to be an absolute return
program focused mainly on
premium capture strategies
with the objective of generating
positive returns in most
market conditions regardless
of whether the underlying
market(s) is up or down.
Both of these programs
focus their trading
activities on a
portfolio of options on
futures contracts
diversified across a
variety of underlying
financial assets.
Opportunity and risk
exposure is further
diversified through the
use of different types
of option combinations
including, but not
limited to, bear
spreads, bull spreads,
condors, ratio spreads,
strangles and calendar
spreads as well as naked
puts and calls. The
variety of position
combinations that are
possible with options
contributes to the
creation of multifaceted
and versatile investment
strategies tailored to
market conditions and
trading outlook.
Generally, both the
Diversified Options
Strategy 1X and 2X are
counter-trend biased in
the sense that these
programs will, for
example, write calls
into rallies and write
puts into declines.
While Cervino Capital
Management will utilize
mechanical signals as a
component of its investment
process, unlike certain
technical traders the Advisor
does not purely follow any
systematic entry and exit
signals in implementing
its trading strategy for
Diversified Options Strategy
1X and 2X. Rather, there
is a significant element
of discretion involved with
Advisor’s formulation and
execution of its trading
ideas for these programs.
The underlying asset classes
and futures contracts upon
which both the Diversified
Options Strategy 1X and
2X focus their options trading
consists primarily of the
S&P 500 equity index, with
additional portfolio exposure,
but to a lesser degree,
in currencies (e.g., Euro,
Yen), and U.S. Treasuries
(e.g., 10 Year U.S. Treasury
Note) and precious metals
(e.g., gold, silver). In
addition, the Advisor may
for accounts funded with
Actual Funds (see Section
2.5 Broker, Account Size,
and Funding) invest in fixed
income securities that are
fungible for margin purposes.
The aforementioned list
of underlying asset
classes is not meant to
be exclusive, and
Cervino Capital
Management may trade
in other markets in its
own discretion in order
to gain exposure to opportunities
in the majority of actively
traded markets, and to achieve
a balance across economic
sectors while simultaneously
limiting, to the extent
possible, undue concentration
in any particular economic
sector. The intent of such
discretion is to increase
opportunities for gain,
decrease risk and provide
more consistent returns.
The trading strategy
largely involves, but is
not limited to, the
implementation of option
combinations such as
bear spreads, bull
spreads, condors, ratio
spreads, strangles and
calendar spreads. The
writing of “naked
options,” is another
strategy that the
Advisor may utilize from
time to time. In
addition the Advisor may
establish outright long
option positions, or
establish long or short
futures positions under
certain market
conditions. Options on
futures may be used by
Cervino Capital
Management on both
a covered basis and an uncovered
basis, but in the vast majority
of circumstances positions
will not be “covered” by
the underlying futures contract(s).
Both put and call options
will be traded.
Due to the nature of
Cervino Capital
Management trading methods
and the experience of its
trading principal, the portfolio
often may not be diversified;
in fact, on occasion, there
may be a heavy concentration
of a given position or a
position complex, which
could result in a greater
return or risk to the account.
While the Advisor may utilize
contingent orders such as
“stop-loss” or “stop-limit”
orders, such orders will
not necessarily limit losses
to intended amounts since
market conditions may make
it impossible to execute
such orders.
The foregoing investment
principles are factors
upon which Cervino
Capital Management bases
its trading decisions for
both the Diversified Options
Strategy 1X and 2X. Such
trading strategies have
been and will be enhanced
or revised from time to
time. The research and trading
methods of the Advisor are
proprietary and confidential.
The description of this
program is, of necessity,
general and is not intended
to be exhaustive.
|
Gold Covered
Call Writing
Program
|
The Gold Covered
Call Writing program involves
a combination of long gold
futures contracts and short
gold call options. The Advisor
intends to maintain a perpetual
long gold futures position
by “rolling the futures
contract forward” to deferred-delivery
futures contracts, and writing
call options on the underlying
gold futures contracts either
“at-the-money,” slightly
“out-of-the-money” or slightly
“in-the-money.” This strategy
is often referred to as
“covered call writing.”
If the futures contract
is purchased simultaneously
with writing the call option,
the strategy is commonly
referred to as a “buy-write.”
If the futures contract
is already an established
position, it is commonly
referred to an “overwrite.”
In either case, the long
futures contract fully collateralizes
or “covers” the obligation
conveyed by writing a call
option contract.
Though the covered call
can be utilized in any market
condition, it is most often
employed when the investor,
while bullish on the underlying
asset, feels that the asset’s
market value will experience
little range over the lifetime
of the call contract. The
investor desires to either
generate additional income
apart from appreciation
in the value of the underlying
asset, and/or provide a
limited amount of protection
against a decline in the
underlying asset value.
While this strategy can
offer limited protection
from a decline in price
of the underlying asset
and limited profit participation
with an increase in asset’s
price, it generates income
because the investor keeps
the premium received from
writing the call. At the
same time, the investor
benefits from maintenance
of a long futures position
in gold which is considered
a “reserve asset,” unless
assigned an exercise notice
on the call and is obligated
to sell the futures contract.
The covered call is widely
regarded as a conservative
strategy because it decreases
the risk of asset ownership.
Maximum profit for the covered
call strategy occurs when
the underlying asset is
at or above the call option's
strike price, either at
its expiration or when a
written call is assigned
an exercise notice before
it expires. The risk of
financial loss with this
strategy comes from the
long gold futures position.
This loss can become substantial
if the gold futures price
continues to decline in
price as the written call
expires. At the call's expiration,
loss can be calculated as
the current market price
of the gold futures contract
less its original purchase
price, plus the premium
received from initial sale
of the call. Any loss accrued
from a decline in the gold
futures price is partially
offset to the extent of
the premium received from
the written call option.
While managing the Gold
Covered Call Writing program,
the Advisor’s opinion in
the underlying position,
whether more bullish or
more bearish, may change
before the call option expires.
It is anticipated that in
order to increase the upside
potential of the program,
when the underlying gold
futures contract goes “into-the-money,”
the Advisor may at its discretion
“roll” the covered call
up and “overwrite” the option
a higher strike price, or
re-establish the strategy
using a different delivery
date futures contract and
option series. Alternatively,
if the underlying gold contract
declines in price and the
premium in the covered call
option also declines, thereby
reducing the effectiveness
of the call option hedge,
the Advisor may at its discretion
“roll” the covered call
down and “overwrite” the
option a lower strike price,
or re-establish the strategy
using a different delivery
date futures contract and
option series. Under certain
circumstances, the Advisor
may decide to “collar” the
underlying gold futures
position by purchasing a
put option in order to protect
the long gold position from
further decline. This is
known as a “married put”
position.
Investors in the Gold Covered
Call Writing program should
be aware that assignment
on written options is always
possible. As expiration
day for the call option
nears, the Advisor will
need to consider different
scenarios depending on whether
the option is in-the-money,
at-the-money or out-of-the-money.
If the option is in-the-money
at option expiration, it
is highly probable that
client accounts will be
assigned an exercise notice
on the written option and
will be required to deliver
the underlying futures position
at the option’s strike price.
If the written option expires
exactly at-the-money, assignment
of an exercise notice on
such a contract is possible,
but should not be assumed.
If the written option expires
out-of-the-money, no action
is necessary since it is
unlikely that an exercise
notice will be initiated.
Under each of the scenarios
described above, the Advisor
at its discretion may choose
to close out the option
position with a closing
purchase transaction prior
to option expiration. It
should be noted that since
the Advisor does not control
which client accounts are
assigned an exercise notice,
it is possible that some
accounts may receive an
assignment while other accounts
do not. Under such circumstances,
the Advisor will take appropriate
action to realign positions
in client accounts as quickly
as possible.
The foregoing investment
principles are factors upon
which the Advisor bases
its trading decisions for
the Gold Covered Call Writing
program. Such trading strategies
have been and will be enhanced
or revised from time to
time. The research and trading
methods of the Advisor are
proprietary and confidential.
The description of this
program is, of necessity,
general and is not intended
to be exhaustive. As of
the date of this Disclosure
Document, the Advisor previously
has not directed any accounts
in the Gold Covered Call
Writing program.
For additional
information on the Gold
Covered Call Writing
Program, please download
the
detailed program
explanation.
|
Background and
History of Gold
as a Reserve
Asset
|
Central banks, and official
international institutions,
have been major holders
of gold for more than 100
years and are expected to
retain large stocks in future.
Central banks started building
up their stocks of gold
from the 1880s during the
period of the classical
gold standard. Under that
system, for countries on
the gold standard, the amount
of money in circulation
was linked to the country's
gold stock, and paper money
was convertible into gold
at a fixed price. The rise
in official gold stocks
began during the period
of economic nationalism
between the two world wars.
Up to that point, most gold
had been held privately,
circulating as currency
among citizens and across
borders in commercial trade
transactions. Gold, which
had been the foundation
of the first genuinely international
monetary system during the
period before World War
I, came to be used as a
weapon in economic competition
and national rivalries.
In 1933-34, the United States
under President Roosevelt
devalued the dollar in terms
of gold, raising the price
from $20.67 an ounce to
$35 an ounce. This new higher
price caused holders of
gold around the world to
sell their holdings to the
United States. At their
peak in the 1960s, official
gold stocks reached about
38,000 tonnes and probably
accounted for about 50%
of all above ground stocks.
Until the 1970s, central
banks kept gold because,
through the fixed official
dollar price of gold and
dollar convertibility, it
was the foundation of the
international monetary system.
Although there was no direct
link between gold holdings
and national money supplies
(as there had been under
the classic gold standard),
gold was considered the
primary “reserve asset.”
Central banks could convert
dollar balances into gold
at the official price. So
gold provided the “anchor”
to which all currencies
of member countries were
linked, directly or indirectly.
But gradually, as central
banks created more money
than was consistent with
stable prices, and after
several years of moderate
but persistent inflation,
the fixed official gold
price again became unrealistic,
and the United States, as
the pivot of the system,
was faced with the choice
of deflating, devaluing
or abandoning the system.
In August 1971, it abandoned
the system, with President
Nixon “closing the gold
window.” In the 1980s and
1990s central banks began
re-appraising the role of
gold in their external reserves.
The movement to central
bank independence and the
more commercial attitude
of their reserve managers
led some of them to put
more emphasis on the current
yield on their reserve portfolios.
In this environment, gold,
as an asset that earns no
interest, apart from a small
return available from lending
gold for those central banks
willing to engage in the
lending market, began to
look vulnerable. Some central
banks decided to reduce
their gold holdings, and
the total of official stocks
declined by about 10% between
1980 and 1999.
In September 1999, a group
of European central banks
agreed, in the first Central
Bank Gold Agreement (CBGA
1), to limit disposals to
400 tonnes a year for five
years, and also set a ceiling
on the volume of gold lent
to the market. They also
reaffirmed their confidence
in the future of gold as
a reserve asset. The agreement
reassured the market about
the intentions of central
banks, since the signatories
included those that had
been seen as the most likely
major sellers, and the price,
which had reached a low
of $252 an ounce in July
1999, stabilized. CBGA 1
proved very successful and
was renewed CBGA 2 for a
further five year term in
2004. On August 7, 2009,
the European Central Bank
and 18 other central banks
signed a 5-year extension
of CBGA. The current CBGA
caps sales at 500 tons a
year and expires on September
26, 2009. The new CBGA extends
the agreement for another
5 years—through 2014—with
a ceiling of 400 tons per
year.
::
Davide Accomazzo
Davide Accomazzo has been
trading professionally since
1996. From July 1996 through
December 1997 he was employed
as a Euro-convertible bond/international
equities sales trader for
Jefferies and Company, Inc.,
an investment bank. In this
position, he covered many
international funds, including:
Arca, La Generali, Hansberger,
New Africa Fund/NCM, Cranberry
Rock, Pontaray, Weston Group,
and Oppenheimer retail international
desk. In January 1998 he
left to trade his own capital
and in November 1999 he
started Kensington Offshore
Limited, a speculative hedge
fund which outperformed
the S&P 500 market benchmark
during the 1999 through
2002 equity markets’ boom
and bust cycles. In February
2001 he launched Kensington
Capital Management, LLC,
a commodity trading advisor
that focused on trading
options on futures and currency
futures. Mr. Accomazzo was
signed on by UBS Wealth
Management USA, a broker-dealer,
in October 2004 to manage
the portfolios of high net
worth investors, and withdrew
as principal and associated
person of Kensington Capital
Management, LLC in November
2004. In October 2005, Mr.
Accomazzo resigned from
UBS having co-founded Cervino
Capital Management LLC with
Michael Frankfurter.
Mr. Accomazzo received a
Laurea in Political Sciences
and International Relations
at Universita' degli Studi
Genova in 1990, a Masters
in Arts in Mass Communication
from California State University
Northridge in 1992, and
his MBA in Finance at the
School of Business and Management
at Pepperdine University
in June 1996. During his
academic career he worked
in collaboration with Investment
Technology Group (“ITG”)
on projects that focused
on automated portfolio management
through Quantex, ITG’s electronic
execution system. Since
August 2007 Mr. Accomazzo
has also served as an adjunct
professor at Pepperdine
University, Graziadio School
of Business and Management,
where he teaches courses
on global capital markets
and portfolio investment
management.
::
Michael W. Frankfurter
Michael “Mack” Frankfurter
started his career in the
financial services industry
in 1989 with Bank of America,
a commercial bank. In July
1991 he was recruited by
private equity boutique
The Echelon Group, Inc.
(subsequently restructured
as The Echelon Group of
Companies, LLC) as vice
president in charge of operations
of Echelon’s managed futures
business. As an associated
person, Mr. Frankfurter
was involved with the startup,
accounting, client services,
compliance, backoffice and
marketing of multiple Echelon-related
joint venture commodity
trading advisors including
Ark Capital Management,
Dreiss Research Corporation,
Echelon Capital Advisors,
Jackson Grain Management,
Longview Capital Management,
Range Wise and Royal Union
Petroleum Group. Mr. Frankfurter
was also involved in activities
related to the establishment
of other Echelon-related
ventures including Dignity
Partners, Inc., a viatical
settlement business. Dignity
Partners institutionalized
the viatical settlement
industry by successfully
completing a private placement
of $50 million in securitized
notes (voted “1995 Private
Deal of the Year” by Investment
Dealers Digest), and a subsequent
initial public offering
in 1996. Later renamed Point
West Capital Corporation,
the company launched a venture
capital subsidiary, a correspondent
broker subsidiary and a
specialty business-lender
subsidiary. During this
time Mr. Frankfurter was
responsible for implementing
and maintaining both Echelon’s
and Point West’s information
systems while continuing
to administer to Echelon’s
managed futures business.
Mr. Frankfurter left Echelon
and Point West in January
1999. After spending some
time off sailing and traveling,
he worked as a consultant
on projects for FleetBoston
Robertson Stephens. In January
2000 he briefly became an
associated person of The
Pixley Group, an introducing
broker, prior to being recruited
in July 2000 by The Capital
Markets Company (Capco)
as senior consultant to
work as project manager
for an online private banking
startup and joint venture
between Scudder Kemper and
Thomas Weisel Partners.
That long-term project was
followed by an international
inter-company trading systems
implementation for Commerzbank
involving Royalblue fidessa,
and a T+1/STP readiness
assessment for Bank of Montreal.
He left Capco in April 2002
and in May 2002 founded
NextStep Strategies, LLC
which focused on consulting
and headhunting for financial
services companies. NextStep
Strategies was also registered
as a commodity trading advisor
and commodity pool operator
from March 2003 to July
2004. Mr. Frankfurter joined
UBS Financial Services,
Inc., a broker-dealer, in
May 2004 in their Beverly
Hills office and provided
financial advisory services
to clients until June 2005.
He rejoined NextStep Strategies,
LLC in July 2005 and co-founded
Cervino Capital Management
LLC with Davide Accomazzo
in August 2005. In September
2007, Mr. Frankfurter became
an associated person of
Managed Account Research,
Inc.
(“MARI”), an introducing
broker, where he functions
in an operational and administrative
capacity.
The descriptions above are
from the manager’s disclosure
document.
THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING
FUTURES, OPTIONS AND OFF-EXCHANGE
FOREX CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY
INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
PLEASE READ THE CTA'S RISK
DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT CAREFULLY
BEFORE INVESTING MONEY.
Disclosure
Statement
Disclosure
Document
Management
Agreement
Download
Page
Print
Page

|
Didn't
find what you were
looking for?
.
ALTAVRA offers many
programs in addition
to those listed
on this website.
.
Contact us at 1-800-998-7870
or
clientservices@altavra.com.
|